
.png)
Agency & Community Outreach
Early and Ongoing Outreach
Input was gathered early in the process and will continue to be gathered throughout the studies:
-
Key stakeholder and property owner meetings
-
46 in-depth interviews
-
A workshop focused on walking and biking
- Community Working Group (CWG) workshops
-
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) meetings
-
Public meetings
In a collaborative role to ITD, the CWG and TAC provide input on study findings. The same findings are presented to the public.
Feedback from the CWG, the TAC, and the public helps identify community values and a vision for transportation in the area.
Community Identification
The regional and local stakeholders and community members include:
-
Agencies
-
City government
-
County and state government
-
Education organizations
-
Emergency services/healthcare
-
Environmental groups
-
Faith-based organizations
-
Freight representatives
-
Housing/residential/neighborhood associations
-
Support health organizations
-
Tourism/recreation groups
-
Traditional underserved populations, including low-income and minority
-
Tribal nations (sovereign entities)
What We've Heard
Community Feedback
Community values and ideas for potential solutions are an important part of the process. Feedback provided the basis for each study's Purpose & Need statement and evaluation criteria and allowed the study teams to understand the community's values and concerns. The most frequently mentioned themes by the public were:
Roadway and Traffic
-
Visibility and sight distance
-
Sharp curves and turns
-
Intersection types
-
Lane and shoulder widths
-
Turn lanes
-
Passing lanes
-
Traffic congestion and signage
Alternative Routes
-
Preferences, suggestions, and dislikes
Active Transportation
-
Walking and biking
-
State highway crossings
Integrating Input
Public comments provided the basis for initial concept development. These ideas were later overlaid with engineering best practices and environmental, traffic, safety, and planning data to create concepts.